Colorado Rapids vs Chicago Fire

Major League SoccerMatchweek 33
Ref: Malik BadawiDick's Sporting Goods Park, Commerce City, Colorado · 19,734 cap
Fipster Pick
Home WinhighMiss

Match recap

Chicago Fire beat Colorado Rapids 4–2 in their Major League Soccer fixture. Whittaker and Aaronson scored for Colorado Rapids; Bamba, Bamba, Lewandowski, and Dithejane replied for Chicago Fire. Expected-goals data put the chance balance at 1.45 for Colorado Rapids versus 2.37 for Chicago Fire.

FıpsterSelf-Score Card
Overconfident✗ Miss
Fipster's Pick✗
3–1
HT 1–0
Final Result
2–4
HT 1–1
36%Poor
F
✗Outcome✗Exact score✓Both scored✓Goals✗Halftime
Fipster's self review1 Nov 2026

Outcome probability

Colorado Rapids 76%Draw 12%Chicago Fire 12%

As the regular season nears its climax, Colorado Rapids look poised to extend their home scoring run against Chicago Fire. Both teams have shown attacking intent recently, but the Rapids' midfield creativity and home form could prove decisive.

Match factors

Form Momentumhigh

Colorado Rapids' home scoring streak

Colorado Rapids have scored in their last 5 home games, showing strong attacking form at home

Form Momentummedium

Chicago Fire's recent scoring consistency

Chicago Fire have scored in 4 of their last 5 matches, maintaining offensive pressure

Injury Impactmedium

Colorado Rapids missing key attackers

Colorado Rapids have 2 attackers doubtful including I. Sadiq, which may limit attacking options if they don't start

Tactical Advantagehigh

Colorado Rapids' strong midfield creators

Players like Paxten Aaronson and Hamzat Ojediran provide creative passing and assist potential to unlock Chicago's defense

Statistical Edgehigh

Chicago Fire's key attacking duo

Lewandowski and Haile-Selassie lead Chicago's attack with consistent goal and assist contributions

The context

Colorado Rapids currently sit 9th in their league with 42 points from 31 games, reflecting a mixed season of 12 wins, 6 draws, and 13 losses. Chicago Fire have maintained offensive pressure, scoring in four of their last five matches, while Rapids have found the net in their last five home games. The Rapids face some uncertainty with two attackers doubtful, including I. Sadiq, which might limit their options upfront.

Key insights

  • P

    Paxten Aaronson

    Colorado Rapids

    Provides creative passing and assist potential to unlock Chicago's defence.

    Major League Soccer 26/27High assist involvement in recent matches and strong passing stats.

  • H

    Hamzat Ojediran

    Colorado Rapids

    Contributes both defensively and offensively with high passing volume.

    Major League Soccer 26/27Solid midfield presence and potential key playmaker.

  • R

    Robert Lewandowski

    Chicago Fire

    Central to Chicago Fire's attack with multiple recent goals.

    Major League Soccer 26/27Prolific scorer with consistent goal contributions.

  • M

    Maren Haile-Selassie

    Chicago Fire

    Key creative force with strong assist and goal involvement.

    Major League Soccer 26/27High recent ratings and goal contributions.

Analysis

The Rapids' midfield duo, Paxten Aaronson and Hamzat Ojediran, have been instrumental in creating chances and unlocking defences, giving them a tactical edge. Chicago Fire rely heavily on their attacking pair, Robert Lewandowski and Maren Haile-Selassie, who consistently contribute goals and assists. However, the Rapids' home scoring streak and creative midfield presence suggest they can control the game and secure a comfortable win.

Key facts

  1. 1.Colorado Rapids are ranked 9th in their league with 42 points from 31 games (W12 D6 L13).
  2. 2.Colorado Rapids have scored in their last 5 home games, showing strong attacking form at home.
  3. 3.Chicago Fire have scored in 4 of their last 5 matches, maintaining offensive pressure.
  4. 4.Colorado Rapids have two attackers doubtful, including I. Sadiq, which may limit attacking options.
  5. 5.Paxten Aaronson and Hamzat Ojediran provide creative passing and assist potential for Colorado Rapids.
  6. 6.Robert Lewandowski and Maren Haile-Selassie lead Chicago Fire's attack with consistent goal and assist contributions.

Prediction

We predict Colorado Rapids to lead 1-0 at halftime and extend their advantage to a 3-1 victory by fulltime. The model strongly favours a home win with this scoreline, reflecting the Rapids' attacking form and ability to break down Chicago's defence. Expect a competitive match with around four cards shown, but ultimately a clear Rapids triumph.

Player Insights

Standout players Fipster expects to impact the match — curated highlights, not full squad lists

Home — Colorado Rapids

R. Holding

R. Holding

Defender

Colorado Rapids

Total Passes
2068
30 played
29 starts
2378 mins
~79 mins/game
H. Ojediran

H. Ojediran

Midfielder

Colorado Rapids

Total Passes
1395
31 played
26 starts
2069 mins
~67 mins/game

Away — Chicago Fire

J. Elliott

J. Elliott

Defender

Chicago Fire

Total Passes
1788
30 played
28 starts
2459 mins
~82 mins/game
A. Salétros

A. Salétros

Midfielder

Chicago Fire

Total Passes
1506
29 played
28 starts
2432 mins
~84 mins/game
T. D'Avilla

T. D'Avilla

Midfielder

Chicago Fire

Total Passes
1412
31 played
27 starts
2191 mins
~71 mins/game

The verdict

In summary, the Rapids' home form and midfield creativity should see them through against a resilient Chicago Fire side. While Chicago's key attackers will test the defence, the Rapids are expected to come out on top with a 3-1 scoreline, continuing their recent scoring run.

Prediction generated 29 Oct 2026, 04:40 UTC · Fipster Model v1.166

Prediction Q&A

Who did Fipster predict to win Colorado Rapids vs Chicago Fire?
Fipster's AI model predicted Colorado Rapids to win against Chicago Fire.
What score did Fipster predict for Colorado Rapids vs Chicago Fire?
Fipster predicted a final score of Colorado Rapids 3–1 Chicago Fire.
What were the win probabilities for Colorado Rapids vs Chicago Fire?
Fipster's model gave Colorado Rapids a 76% chance of winning, Chicago Fire a 12% chance, and a 12% chance of a draw.
How confident was Fipster in this prediction?
Fipster's model assigned this prediction 76% confidence — a high-confidence call.